350 Tons of Thoughts

1. If John Kerry had been elected four years ago, would the "Missing Weapons" story ever seen the light of day? Answer: No, because with the exception of 9/11, none of what happened in the last four years would have happened. No liberation of Afghanistan and Iraq, no strong message to terrorists, and even less would be known about the weapons than we know now.
2. How can anyone say Bush was wrong in not trusting the UN inspection process, when that process led to nothing more than tagging weapons ... not destroying them?
3. Why didn't CBS learn anything from Rathergate? Why weren't they scared to launch a highly questionable anti-Bush story just 36 hours or so before the election?
4. Why is CBS immune? They are so obviously partisan, yet they use the public airwaves without fear.
5. Why did the New York Times bury the controversy about its story today (on pg. 10, with no link on their online edition)?
6. Will anyone lose their job at the NY Times over this? Answer: No.
7. Why didn't the LA Times cover the controversy about the New York Times story today?
8. Has any member of any crowd that Kerry shilled on this topic today not read or heard about the controversy?
9. When will we find out that the Kerry campaign was approached by the same anonymous source (no doubt someone from the U.N.) that took the story to the NY Times and CBS?
10. How does Kerry balance "terrorism isn't a real threat/wrong war, wrong time, wrong place" with "missing 350 tons of weapons?" Answer: Easy; he's got a lot of practice.
11. Could I feel any more nausiated than I did when I heard of the tape ABC's holding? These people are so sick that there is no alternative but all-out assault.
12. How can anyone vote for Kerry in light of the obvious answers to questions 1-10 above?