UN Congo Sex Scandal: LA Times Responds
In my post of Nov. 27 post, LA Times Squelches U.N. Congo Sex Story (scroll down), I speculated about why reference to the rape of 150 12-15 year old girls had been dropped so quickly from their coverage. Reporter Maggie Farley answered the question, e-mailing me:
Much more is coming on the Congo exploitation story. You are wrong to try to read anything into it not being mentioned in the story about attempts to maintain a Central African peace agreement. We kept the focus narrow because of space constraints.
I sometimes feel as cynical as the reporters and editors I used to work with ... I can't help but think that other stories on other subjects would have included a reference -- you know, Abu Ghraib references in Guantanamo stories, that kind of thing.
But undeniably, Maggie is to be commended for breaking this story. It's a shame so many other MSM have not yet given it the coverage it deserves.
Much more is coming on the Congo exploitation story. You are wrong to try to read anything into it not being mentioned in the story about attempts to maintain a Central African peace agreement. We kept the focus narrow because of space constraints.
I sometimes feel as cynical as the reporters and editors I used to work with ... I can't help but think that other stories on other subjects would have included a reference -- you know, Abu Ghraib references in Guantanamo stories, that kind of thing.
But undeniably, Maggie is to be commended for breaking this story. It's a shame so many other MSM have not yet given it the coverage it deserves.
<< Home